Performance standards must be quantified when it is possible to do so. Quantifiable standards are more precise than qualitative standards. If a user is incapable of specifying precisely the performance he wants from an asset, then it is difficult to make the maintenance personnel responsible for maintaining performance. It is from these performance standards that one can identify the possible different failure modes et and mechanisms.
From the archived data and the multi-dimensional statistical analysis, it is possible to establish performance standards, which simultaneously take into account the many other variables. One lone indicator, taking into account all the others.
«Why follow 50 different indicators when with only 2 or 3 you can get a performance follow-up that is just as good?»
«PBM inc. takes into account all the possible correlations between the different indicators currently used in the manufacturing sector and reduces them to a strict minimum.»
